Difference between Arlen Ness Twin Sucker Front Performance Filter & the K & N ?
turbobuick
Posted 2010-02-07 8:32 AM (#52812)
Subject: Difference between Arlen Ness Twin Sucker Front Performance Filter & the K & N ?


Cruiser

Posts: 161
Tampa, Fl United States
Any performance gain, I have the Kevinx cam package along w/ S1L1 & K & N filter-wondering if the twin sucker would had anymore value (HP/Torque) or don't waste my money?

FRED
Top of the page Bottom of the page
VisionTex
Posted 2010-02-07 11:53 AM (#52844 - in reply to #52812)
Subject: RE: Difference between Arlen Ness Twin Sucker Front Performance Filter & the K & N ?


Visionary

Posts: 1484
LaPorte,Tx.
I would go with the Lloydz intake plate for under $100. With the cams which allows the bike to breathe better, I would think and intake plate would be worth the $s spent. Send a PM to Lloyd, he will tell you if there is an advantage.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2010-02-07 12:11 PM (#52847 - in reply to #52812)
Subject: Re: Difference between Arlen Ness Twin Sucker Front Performance Filter & the K & N ?


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
At this time Lloyd does not have a manufacturer for his top intake plates, but that is what Fred has already has. That said the dif between the Ness, and the Vic S1 front filter is non exsistant as far as performance goes
Top of the page Bottom of the page
turbobuick
Posted 2010-02-07 1:29 PM (#52857 - in reply to #52847)
Subject: Re: Difference between Arlen Ness Twin Sucker Front Performance Filter & the K & N ?


Cruiser

Posts: 161
Tampa, Fl United States
kevinx - 2010-02-07 1:11 PM

At this time Lloyd does not have a manufacturer for his top intake plates, but that is what Fred has already has. That said the dif between the Ness, and the Vic S1 front filter is non exsistant as far as performance goes



Thanks Kevin for the reply
Top of the page Bottom of the page