Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS
kevinx
Posted 2008-12-14 8:13 AM (#25022)
Subject: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
OK finally had a chance to get Devilboys Vision on the dyno after installing the new Lloyds cams. I will say that we did have a little bit of a surprise. With a stock map in place I could not add enough fuel to get everything out of it. The last half of the run is pretty much above 14\1 A\F so it gave up a bit. Looking at the sheet you will see the torque starting to peak, but cut off by the mixture going lean. After speaking to Lloyd tonight we figured out that the Stage map puts in a bunch more fuel then anticipated. He is going to write some new code for the VFC that I will be able to program in, and that should get the Devil's bike right. for the rest of you I would leave in the Stage map if you are planning on this upgrade. That said I am sure that Loyd will have the reprogramed VFC available if needed

Another thing worth mentioning is that I set the cruise A\F up at 13.8 against the dyno brake. This is slightly richer then Vic sets it up from the Factory. Devilboy rode a couple hundred miles today, and said the bike felt smoother, and like an animal ready to get off the leash. He also said that fuel economy IMPROVED BY 2MPG!!!



(devil dyno.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments devil dyno.jpg (55KB - 2 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2008-12-14 9:20 AM (#25028 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
Forgot to add that torque starts off at 90FtLb, and clears 100 at 2700RPM. It then NEVER dips below 100 after that. This should eliminate questions about loss of bottom end torque. Motor feels about the same till 3k, and then it is like a monster. Perfect for those 2 lane passing situations
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Glock
Posted 2008-12-14 10:10 AM (#25037 - in reply to #25028)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 50
Thanks to Kevin and Lloyd for all your R&D.

Glock
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Stryker
Posted 2008-12-14 10:41 AM (#25038 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Puddle Jumper

Posts: 41
Oviedo, FL
KevinX, will Lloyd also develop a reprogram for those of us with the stage 1 level 2 map? I'm starting to feel like an expected parent with the ideal of some added performance to our Vision's without losing it's touring potential and mpg.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
devilboy
Posted 2008-12-14 11:57 AM (#25042 - in reply to #25038)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 296
Central Florida
Stryker - 2008-12-14 10:41 AM

KevinX, will Lloyd also develop a reprogram for those of us with the stage 1 level 2 map? I'm starting to feel like an expected parent with the ideal of some added performance to our Vision's without losing it's touring potential and mpg.


I don't think it will be necessary S1L2 map probably adds a little more fuel at WOT so it might be just right. I am sure Kevin or Lloyd could answer better.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2008-12-14 12:31 PM (#25045 - in reply to #25038)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
Stryker - 2008-12-14 10:41 AM

KevinX, will Lloyd also develop a reprogram for those of us with the stage 1 level 2 map? I'm starting to feel like an expected parent with the ideal of some added performance to our Vision's without losing it's touring potential and mpg.


As the Devil himself said. You should have no problems getting enough fuel with your program in place. I can't wait to get my hands on her to see what REAL difference there is in the two levels of pipe
Top of the page Bottom of the page
devilboy
Posted 2008-12-15 1:07 PM (#25077 - in reply to #25038)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 296
Central Florida
Stryker - 2008-12-14 10:41 AM

KevinX, will Lloyd also develop a reprogram for those of us with the stage 1 level 2 map? I'm starting to feel like an expected parent with the ideal of some added performance to our Vision's without losing it's touring potential and mpg.


Does that mean Stryker is next in line for cams???
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Stryker
Posted 2008-12-15 1:19 PM (#25078 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Puddle Jumper

Posts: 41
Oviedo, FL
You betcha'
Top of the page Bottom of the page
devilboy
Posted 2008-12-15 5:30 PM (#25089 - in reply to #25078)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 296
Central Florida
Stryker - 2008-12-15 1:19 PM

You betcha'


Kevin is doing his this weekend when he gets back from School...
now I will NEVER outrun him!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TimS
Posted 2008-12-22 8:22 PM (#25450 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 810

KevinX,

How long did the install take?  Did you have to pull the motor to replace the CAMS ?

Thanks,

Tim

Top of the page Bottom of the page
ElroyJ
Posted 2008-12-24 12:32 PM (#25506 - in reply to #25450)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Tourer

Posts: 460
Centennial, CO
I am also curious about this AND the cost. I would love to get a bit more out of my motor.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2008-12-28 3:24 PM (#25684 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
i was wondering ths same thing.. Cost of install vs gains in performance to see if the cost is worth the handful of extra ponies.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
devilboy
Posted 2008-12-28 9:22 PM (#25704 - in reply to #25684)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 296
Central Florida
S1L1 set up with VFCIII and stock map gave me max HP 91 and TQ 105.
with only changing the cam to Lloydz new Vision Grind we are 107HP and 108TQ(with more to come with VFCIII reset-should be about 114/114 with enough fuel at Wide open throttle)
we are looking at 23 peak HP more and 3 peak TQ more.
if you look at chart you will see that 100/100 comes at about 2400 rpm and remains that # or higher until rev limiter. It is a totally different bike and worth every penny of the cost.
Motor doesnt have to be removed from Bike and Kevin took approx 4 hours to R&R cams.
Cams are $385 and labor can vary depending on labor rates in your area.
It is totally worth the expense as the bike pulls like nothing out there.
In addition to smoother operation, my Gas Mileage has increased by approx 2 MPG
and I managed the same or better MPG on a recent 850 mile trip to south Florida including a prolonged run in triple digits on the Florida turnpike.
Kevin had similar results on his Kingpin with flatter and Fatter curve from 2400 rpm to red line.
he also had MPG increase and this is probably due to increased efficiency.
Ride safe all you Vision-Riders and have a Happy and Healthy NEW year!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
dr_reloader
Posted 2008-12-28 9:49 PM (#25705 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Tourer

Posts: 537
, FL United States
Hmm. Looks like I might have to drive to the dreaded swamp.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ScoreBo
Posted 2008-12-28 11:23 PM (#25710 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 1117
Northeast Ohio
My dealer has these on order for me too. So Lloyd is fixing the stock, not stage map, fueling issue?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tralphaz
Posted 2008-12-29 12:13 AM (#25716 - in reply to #25704)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Tourer

Posts: 353
devilboy - 2008-12-28 6:22 PM


Motor doesnt have to be removed from Bike and Kevin took approx 4 hours to R&R cams.
Cams are $385 and labor can vary depending on labor rates in your area.



I would love to know what is involved in the install, I just might be willing to do the job myself.
Any info available?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
devilboy
Posted 2008-12-29 12:20 AM (#25717 - in reply to #25710)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 296
Central Florida
ScoreBo - 2008-12-28 11:23 PM

My dealer has these on order for me too. So Lloyd is fixing the stock, not stage map, fueling issue?


I had gone back to stock map when recall was done for popping and drivability, since I was running too rich with stage map. and losing HP/TQ. Now with the cam, It is running lean at WOT
so Lloyd is reprogramming VFCIII. If you are thinking about Cams on your Vision, when you do recall do the stage map and you should be right on the money. If you have stock map, Lloyd can up the quantity of fuel on WOT(red pot) to get max performance. If you look at dyno chart you will see that it is running too lean from 3600 to rev limiter. with the optimal a/f set up, you should get another 7HP and 9 TQ at max power spot.
DO NOT forget that Max HP/TQ is not indicative of how bike runs but just a snapshot of max possible power. What is MORE important is that HP and TQ is much stronger from 2400-redline
and this is what your butt will tell you.



(june.28.dyno.a.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments june.28.dyno.a.jpg (55KB - 11 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ScoreBo
Posted 2008-12-29 5:00 PM (#25735 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 1117
Northeast Ohio
I am running the stock map and always have been. When you say reprogram the VFC, is there anything that needs physically done to the box by Lloyd? I totally understand tuning as I also have a 650HP Subaru STi, but these boxes don't have an input to modify the programming. So I am assuming you mean just maxing out the red pots.

DB, how does the bike really feel? I REALLY want to do this but am very concerned about affecting reliability.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
devilboy
Posted 2008-12-29 11:08 PM (#25756 - in reply to #25735)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 296
Central Florida
ScoreBo - 2008-12-29 5:00 PM

I am running the stock map and always have been. When you say reprogram the VFC, is there anything that needs physically done to the box by Lloyd? I totally understand tuning as I also have a 650HP Subaru STi, but these boxes don't have an input to modify the programming. So I am assuming you mean just maxing out the red pots.

DB, how does the bike really feel? I REALLY want to do this but am very concerned about affecting reliability.


VFCIII will actually be reprogrammed as my red pot is maxed out and still not getting enough fuel at WOT.Lloyd just has to change programming to allow more fuel at WOT.
Bike idles at same 1K after warm up and runs smoother at all RPMs I do not believe reliability is going to be an issue. I have done approx 1200 miles since cam change with all types of riding, stop and Go in Miami, Back roads through the orange groves in central Florida and wide open on turnpike at triple digit speeds for over an hour straight. Mileage is same or better and for 100+ mph stretch I averaged approx 38 mpg. No stalling, popping or other drivability issues.
when tach hits 2500 in lower gears just hold on!!!
I am also sending you a PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
mkultra
Posted 2009-01-05 2:11 PM (#26115 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Tourer

Posts: 374
Tucson, AZ
Does Victory have performance cams or is everyone using Lloyds? I ask this because i am interested in doing cams, i know Lloyds are Andrews cams, and have checked Andrews website for lift and duration but nothing on the Vision cams. Heck i dont even know the lift of the stock cams. I know warranty claims are a dealer thingy, meaning they can finagle the process to corporate as to whether or not certain items are covered and with that i can understand the Dealer wanting to use parts they sell to make a quarter verses a dime. Now if Victory has performance cams and they are in the same ballpark, duration and lift, i might consider it. Also i am confused as to how the rear rocker cover is removed without pulling the motor. Only way i can see is to pull one front motor mount bolt, and the rear ones to let the motor pivot at the front thus lowering the rear cylinder?...any help would be appreciated....i was quoted appx. 10 hrs labor.

mike
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TimS
Posted 2009-01-05 2:20 PM (#26116 - in reply to #26115)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 810

mkultra - 2009-01-05 11:11 AM ... i know Lloyds are Andrews cams, ...

 

Mike,

Lloyds sells Andrews cams and his own cams that he is having made to his own specs.  They are NOT one and the same.  Victory is using their own Stage 2 cams in the 2009 models (don't know who they are made by, maybe S&S).

Some dealers have been using the Andrews cams that have been around for a while.  Lloydz has just released his cams just before Christmas and people are starting to use his cams. 

I will let Lloydz and/or KevinX explain the difference between the various cams.

HTH,

Tim

Happy New Year



Edited by TimS 2009-01-05 2:22 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-05 8:06 PM (#26143 - in reply to #26115)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
since you mentioned warranty. if you do the cams you might as well forget that warranty. even if they are victory cams. cause they arent victory cams for the vision.. even know they are for a 106 engine. but try explain your claim to victory and see what they say.. If you cracked your engine and put a part there that wasnt made for that bike you can bet you would have to fight if the time came for a warranty claim. basically id say to Read your warranty. i bough the extended warranty and i will say this. out of all the bikes i have owned victory is the only one that wants Proof of your oil changes. This is in the paperwork for my victory extended warranty. That just shown me if your engine has a issue with something major they WILL be checking your paperwork! just my 2cents.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lotzafun
Posted 2009-01-05 9:13 PM (#26150 - in reply to #26143)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 935
Rockford, IL

Arkainzeye - 2009-01-05 7:06 PM since you mentioned warranty. if you do the cams you might as well forget that warranty. even if they are victory cams. cause they arent victory cams for the vision.. even know they are for a 106 engine. but try explain your claim to victory and see what they say.. If you cracked your engine and put a part there that wasnt made for that bike you can bet you would have to fight if the time came for a warranty claim. basically id say to Read your warranty. i bough the extended warranty and i will say this. out of all the bikes i have owned victory is the only one that wants Proof of your oil changes. This is in the paperwork for my victory extended warranty. That just shown me if your engine has a issue with something major they WILL be checking your paperwork! just my 2cents.

You might want to do some research on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

In a nutshell.....if you install cams and something else goes wrong the burden is ON THE DEALER to show that the cams caused some type of a failure with whatever went wrong. Meaning if you install cams and something goes wrong with your crankshaft the dealer HAS to to either honor the warranty and take care of the crankshaft or they have to PROVE the cams caused the crankshaft problem.

Since this burden of proof is on the dealer and not the consumer there is no "fight" or anything needed.

Do the research and you will understand what I'm saying

 

 

 p.s. don't mean to hijack the thread

 



Edited by Lotzafun 2009-01-05 9:14 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
mkultra
Posted 2009-01-06 8:34 AM (#26172 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Tourer

Posts: 374
Tucson, AZ
I fully understand Magnuson-Moss deal. I went round and round with the other American motorcycle dealership in 2004 and was treated like an idiot. After 7 months of B.S. and 6 trips in for service i had had enough. Fortunately for me a riding bud is an attorney and things went well after that. This was even on parts the dealer installed. But when cams are put in and the neck bearing go bad there really is no relationship....long story short, my Vic dealer is great to work with and told me to do the research as to which cams i wanted. He also told me it was the dealers first priorty to back up their work. I was just looking for the difference in cams. Thanks to all who replied.

mike
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-06 9:04 AM (#26174 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states that a warranty can NOT be denied IF the dealer provides the "parts" you need FREE of charge.. Example oil changes. if the dealer or maker of what ever you own provides FREE oil changes with free labor and you don't use it and you have a warranty engine failure claim. NOW you will have a fight on your hands. If you read the entire act it states this. The Act is NOT!! For add high performance parts!! lol not even close. its for maintence related items. Items you need in order to maintain your car ,truck,motorcycle.. I think people need to actually read this act. Its not a crutch for doing whatever you want to your bike and having a get out of jail free card when your motorcycle fails on you.. Oh here is a perfect example. On this forum this is a guy that has a Vulcan 2000. with a aftermarket intake. His engine started using oil very badly, it was determined that the engine needed a rebuild! Well kaw denied the warranty because of a aftermarket intake. It was that simple. They claimed the aftermarket intake didn't seal properly and let in dirty which caused the rings to wear. But yet others with the same bike needed a rebuild also and they had stock intakes.. But still the warranty was denied. And was legally allowed to do so… Once again Read the act.. its not for performance parts. Its for REPLACEMENT parts..


Under this federal statute, a manufacturer, who issues a warranty on your motor vehicle, is prohibited from requiring you to use a particular brand of air filter, oil filter, or other service or maintenance item, unless such item is provided, free of charge, under your warranty or unless the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) waives this prohibition against the manufacturer.

Edited by Arkainzeye 2009-01-06 9:07 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2009-01-06 12:54 PM (#26183 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
Man I had not seen thi thread pop back up so many times, and missed it.

Couple of high points
1] Victory does NOT keep track of a bikes service history once it is past the 12 month warrenty. Basically if you do not tell anyone; they will never know you have camss at the extended warrenty company

2] There is a port on the back of the VFC3 that allows it to have it's software updated. Lloyd will make the extra fueling a running change,to all of them. It will not hurt anyone, but it will help those with stock maps, and cams

3] The new HOH cams have NOTHING to ddo with Andrews. They were co-developed by a firm in NZ that does cam design for MOTO GP bikes. These guys know OHC motors like few others in the world. Thye grins so not look like they are even for the same motor as the Andrews stuff

4] I charge 4 hours for the install, and thee motor stays right where it belongs. In order to o the job I had to spend a bunch of coin on tools to get the damn valve cover bolts out. They are a true PITA

Hope that answer the questions
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lotzafun
Posted 2009-01-06 1:13 PM (#26185 - in reply to #26174)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 935
Rockford, IL

Arkainzeye - 2009-01-06 8:04 AM The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states that a warranty can NOT be denied IF the dealer provides the "parts" you need FREE of charge.. Example oil changes. if the dealer or maker of what ever you own provides FREE oil changes with free labor and you don’t use it and you have a warranty engine failure claim. NOW you will have a fight on your hands. If you read the entire act it states this. The Act is NOT!! For add high performance parts!! lol not even close. its for maintence related items. Items you need in order to maintain your car ,truck,motorcycle.. I think people need to actually read this act. Its not a crutch for doing whatever you want to your bike and having a get out of jail free card when your motorcycle fails on you.. Oh here is a perfect example. On this forum this is a guy that has a Vulcan 2000. with a aftermarket intake. His engine started using oil very badly, it was determined that the engine needed a rebuild! Well kaw denied the warranty because of a aftermarket intake. It was that simple. They claimed the aftermarket intake didn’t seal properly and let in dirty which caused the rings to wear. But yet others with the same bike needed a rebuild also and they had stock intakes.. But still the warranty was denied. And was legally allowed to do so… Once again Read the act.. its not for performance parts. Its for REPLACEMENT parts.. Under this federal statute, a manufacturer, who issues a warranty on your motor vehicle, is prohibited from requiring you to use a particular brand of air filter, oil filter, or other service or maintenance item, unless such item is provided, free of charge, under your warranty or unless the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) waives this prohibition against the manufacturer.

Well...I don't wish to start a debate on the finite translation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. It has already been debated and translated and whatever tens of thousands of times all over the net.

I also don't wish to attempt to convince you or anyone else on what to do or not do when it comes to changing or adding or modifying or anything with a vehicle or motorcycle or anything else that may have any type of written warranty.

But I will say that I make my decisions based on previous experience thru my years and also on on my research such as the following.....

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/keeping-your-mods-warranty-intact.html

http://www.pt-tuning.com/policies/Magn-Moss-Act.html

http://www.rpmoutlet.com/aftvsfac.htm

http://www.fuelhoarder.com/page.php?5

http://www.ts-mag.com/t_stx.cfm?action=current_issue_pick&id=281

http://www.allaboutdiesels.com/index.php?view=warranty

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/adv/bus01.shtm

http://www.impalaclub.com/naisso/magmoss.htm

Now...there might be some site that may dispute the information from the sites I've posted above. And to be honest I would like to see "the other side of this coin" so to speak. But until someone does the research and shows me that doing performance mods voids or alters or changes my warranty I'm going to take the path of going with what I know....and order & install cams and whatever other goodies I feel worth my money and time. And I feel pretty much 99.99% confident that I will not have any issues whatsoever with any future warranty claims. I guess this is one of those "I'll do what I wish and you do what you wish" type things.

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-06 2:16 PM (#26187 - in reply to #26185)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
im not arguing with you.. I just want to be clear. are you saying you can do whatever you like to your motorcycle in anyway that you see fit and No one can deny your warranty claim if the motorcycle failed/broke down? Because the Magnuson-moss Act will protect you? It makes me want to read my extended warranty to make sure i didnt sign (agree) to their terms and not knowing what their terms are? I mean with the extended warranty not the factory stock warranty. It makes me wonder why the pages for the warranty are so long if they really cant deny you for whatever you do to your motorcycle. If this is true, and i can do Anything i like then.. WOW let the mods flow~!


Lotzafun - 2009-01-06 1:13 PM

Arkainzeye - 2009-01-06 8:04 AM The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states that a warranty can NOT be denied IF the dealer provides the "parts" you need FREE of charge.. Example oil changes. if the dealer or maker of what ever you own provides FREE oil changes with free labor and you don't use it and you have a warranty engine failure claim. NOW you will have a fight on your hands. If you read the entire act it states this. The Act is NOT!! For add high performance parts!! lol not even close. its for maintence related items. Items you need in order to maintain your car ,truck,motorcycle.. I think people need to actually read this act. Its not a crutch for doing whatever you want to your bike and having a get out of jail free card when your motorcycle fails on you.. Oh here is a perfect example. On this forum this is a guy that has a Vulcan 2000. with a aftermarket intake. His engine started using oil very badly, it was determined that the engine needed a rebuild! Well kaw denied the warranty because of a aftermarket intake. It was that simple. They claimed the aftermarket intake didn't seal properly and let in dirty which caused the rings to wear. But yet others with the same bike needed a rebuild also and they had stock intakes.. But still the warranty was denied. And was legally allowed to do so… Once again Read the act.. its not for performance parts. Its for REPLACEMENT parts.. Under this federal statute, a manufacturer, who issues a warranty on your motor vehicle, is prohibited from requiring you to use a particular brand of air filter, oil filter, or other service or maintenance item, unless such item is provided, free of charge, under your warranty or unless the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) waives this prohibition against the manufacturer.

Well...I don't wish to start a debate on the finite translation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. It has already been debated and translated and whatever tens of thousands of times all over the net.

I also don't wish to attempt to convince you or anyone else on what to do or not do when it comes to changing or adding or modifying or anything with a vehicle or motorcycle or anything else that may have any type of written warranty.

But I will say that I make my decisions based on previous experience thru my years and also on on my research such as the following.....

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/keeping-your-mods-warranty-intact.html

http://www.pt-tuning.com/policies/Magn-Moss-Act.html

http://www.rpmoutlet.com/aftvsfac.htm

http://www.fuelhoarder.com/page.php?5

http://www.ts-mag.com/t_stx.cfm?action=current_issue_pick&id=281

http://www.allaboutdiesels.com/index.php?view=warranty

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/adv/bus01.shtm

http://www.impalaclub.com/naisso/magmoss.htm

Now...there might be some site that may dispute the information from the sites I've posted above. And to be honest I would like to see "the other side of this coin" so to speak. But until someone does the research and shows me that doing performance mods voids or alters or changes my warranty I'm going to take the path of going with what I know....and order & install cams and whatever other goodies I feel worth my money and time. And I feel pretty much 99.99% confident that I will not have any issues whatsoever with any future warranty claims. I guess this is one of those "I'll do what I wish and you do what you wish" type things.

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-06 3:25 PM (#26188 - in reply to #26187)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
i was just looking at the FAQ section on Lloyds website. the last question on the page was interesting.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
coachwes
Posted 2009-01-06 5:43 PM (#26197 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Puddle Jumper

Posts: 24
savannah ga
HEY KEVIN whats your rate and when can you get the next bike in . How long does it take to get the cames from loyds .And the last one how long will you need the bike dropped off. SORRY for all the questions iam very intrested in this mod . I allready have the s1l1 installed so it should be just a R&R job for me .THANKS...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lotzafun
Posted 2009-01-06 7:28 PM (#26208 - in reply to #26187)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 935
Rockford, IL

Arkainzeye - 2009-01-06 1:16 PM im not arguing with you.. I just want to be clear. are you saying you can do whatever you like to your motorcycle in anyway that you see fit and No one can deny your warranty claim if the motorcycle failed/broke down? Because the Magnuson-moss Act will protect you? It makes me want to read my extended warranty to make sure i didnt sign (agree) to their terms and not knowing what their terms are? I mean with the extended warranty not the factory stock warranty. It makes me wonder why the pages for the warranty are so long if they really cant deny you for whatever you do to your motorcycle. If this is true, and i can do Anything i like then.. WOW let the mods flow~!

lol....I knew this post would turn a bit off-topic. But I guess this dialogue is helping site members.

The way I understand the Magnuson act is that I can change whatever I want on my Vision. But what I change is no longer under the OEM warranty, however the rest of the parts that I didn't change are still 100% under OEM warranty.

I mean if I change cams the rest of the engine parts are under warranty. Changing cams does not void the warranty on the crankshaft or pistons or transmission or any other parts. Now....if I change cams and somewhere in the future the cam bearings or journals have a problem then true...this would be an issue that would fall on my dollar to deal with. But if I change cams and the pistons or crankshaft or similar items have a problem then the OEM warranty is in effect and the dealer must either fix the problem or prove that the cams caused the problem.

The following examples aren't meant to be sarcastic by any measure. But......

Lets say that someone changes out headlamp bulbs with non-oem bulbs, like Silverstars. Would this void the warranty...on the alternator?

Lets say that someone changes the tires over to high performance tires. Would this void the warranty...on the wheel bearings?

Lets say that someone changes the speakers. Would this void the warranty...on the radio?

Now lets say that someone changes the cams. Would this void the warranty...on the engine?

 

 

 

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-06 8:41 PM (#26212 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
you got some interesting points and i didnt take them as sarcastic at all. but here is one of the points i was talking about. this is directly from the website selling the cams!!! That gotta say something...

Will doing "performance" engine work void my warranty?

Good Question. Yes, By deciding to do performance work you are choosing to sacrifice your warranty coverage for harder acceleration. We believe an informed decision is most important and with our experience, we can advise you of the pros and cons of any modification you are considering. After all, the decision to do so is solely up to you.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2009-01-06 10:34 PM (#26220 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
Just to clarify something here. Extended warenties are a contract signed as aceptance to all of it's terms, and is not the same as a factory warentee. Listed exceptions CAN be enforced without regard to Magnusan.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lotzafun
Posted 2009-01-06 11:15 PM (#26223 - in reply to #26212)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 935
Rockford, IL

Arkainzeye - 2009-01-06 7:41 PM you got some interesting points and i didnt take them as sarcastic at all. but here is one of the points i was talking about. this is directly from the website selling the cams!!! That gotta say something... Will doing "performance" engine work void my warranty? Good Question. Yes, By deciding to do performance work you are choosing to sacrifice your warranty coverage for harder acceleration. We believe an informed decision is most important and with our experience, we can advise you of the pros and cons of any modification you are considering. After all, the decision to do so is solely up to you.

While I highly respect Lloyd for his immense knowledge when it comes to performance and such I look at this and shake my head a bit at him. An unresearched basic answer to a somewhat vague question. And unfortunately he is kinda shooting himself in the foot when it comes to the "business side" of how the question could and should be answered. At least IMHO. But heck, he might read this post and see what I'm saying and hopefully put down the wrench and change his FAQ, or maybe get our dearest Jeff Martini (JAM) to do the job for him. Or if I find some time maybe I'll touch base with Lloyd, probably thru email, and ask him why he has such a statement in his FAQ area. And hopefully be able to show him possibly a better way to correctly answer this type of question.

Lets define "performance engine work" a bit. To me this means going the route of major engine work with combinations of things like bore kits, pistons, cranks, valves, cams and all of the other goodies. Doing such major work does bring the voiding of a warranty into question. I don't think just replacing cams falls under this umbrella.

But lets say someone installs a turbo or supercharger on a bone stock engine. Does this void the engine warranty? Well I think it more than likely gets into the area of probably yes. Because you are installing something that probably has the capabilities of exceeding the design specifications of what the engine can handle without some type of failure.

So....does installing cams fall under this "exceeding design specifications" area? I'm myself pretty much doubt that they do. If someone from a dealer or Victory Mo. Co. wants to debate this I'd love to. I'd like to hear them say that the Vision engine is not designed to handle this increase in h.p. or torque, beacuse basically they would be having to admit they designed an engine that was "barely good enough". And to be honest I'd probably sell my Vision right away because I don't want an engine thats barely good enough.

 



Edited by Lotzafun 2009-01-06 11:25 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-07 6:57 AM (#26231 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
the only reason i posted that about Lloyd saying your warranty would be gone is.. and i thought he of might have gone through people who later had to file a warranty claim and seen what the outcome was. cause if you think about it coming straight out and saying Yes your warranty would be no more cant be good for his business for a person who is on the fence about doing that mod. but at the sametime if he knows the "truth" or has experienced what has happened to other customers im sure he doesnt want to be misleading and say"dont worry your covered" only to get sued later because that wasnt the case. I could be completely wrong. but i feel there is a reason why he posted something that could decrease the sales of one of his products. Because he has too..? To say well dont tell them you put cams in is not the same as saying you are covered.. If someone has to say that, then that raises questions as to why... Just makes you wonder what has he been though that would Make him put that on his site. and to be really honest. I respect him for doing that.. He's a stand up guy....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2009-01-07 1:03 PM (#26244 - in reply to #26197)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
coachwes - 2009-01-06 5:43 PM

HEY KEVIN whats your rate and when can you get the next bike in . How long does it take to get the cames from loyds .And the last one how long will you need the bike dropped off. SORRY for all the questions iam very intrested in this mod . I allready have the s1l1 installed so it should be just a R&R job for me .THANKS...



Check your inbox please
Top of the page Bottom of the page
coachwes
Posted 2009-01-07 5:59 PM (#26269 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Puddle Jumper

Posts: 24
savannah ga
GOT THE MESSAGE KEVIN THANKS Ill call you tomorrow morning ..
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lloyd
Posted 2009-01-08 9:31 PM (#26364 - in reply to #26115)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 77
mkultra - 2009-01-05 2:11 PM

Does Victory have performance cams or is everyone using Lloyds? I ask this because i am interested in doing cams, i know Lloyds are Andrews cams, and have checked Andrews website for lift and duration but nothing on the Vision cams. Heck i dont even know the lift of the stock cams. I know warranty claims are a dealer thingy, meaning they can finagle the process to corporate as to whether or not certain items are covered and with that i can understand the Dealer wanting to use parts they sell to make a quarter verses a dime. Now if Victory has performance cams and they are in the same ballpark, duration and lift, i might consider it. Also i am confused as to how the rear rocker cover is removed without pulling the motor. Only way i can see is to pull one front motor mount bolt, and the rear ones to let the motor pivot at the front thus lowering the rear cylinder?...any help would be appreciated....i was quoted appx. 10 hrs labor.

mike


Mike,

Tim is correct, my cams are NOT made by Andrews, or S&S. They are a different proifile then ANY other Victory cam out there and are designed to work based on exact flow rates and compressions of these motors. They will NOT work with high compression 08-09 bikes, they will work with high compression in the 02-07 bikes. The company that produces them was selected for their high degree of 4 valve head knowledge, no other V-Twin manufacture of cams can come close to producing what these guys do. I don't give cam specs because of 2 reasons, one I worked hard to get these to were they are and if someone wants them they can get them the hard way, by spending a few hours degreeing them, 2 why? They work, so what are specs going to do for someone? If you compare them to the other offerings you'll look at them and say this doesn't add up. these things are in the next ball park. And you'd be right, because we hit a home run with them.

The rear rocker cover gets removed by pulling the 2 bolts located behind the rear cylinder (there are 4 total) that hold the front frame section. Do this with the motor secured underneath, then grab a long pry bar and pry up the front frame section where you removed the bolts. Only an 1/8 of an inch is needed! remove the cover. This can be done with ALL the body work in place and I guess it saves 6-8 hours. IMO 4 hrs is an acceptable time period to swap out the cams in a 08 bike.
Lloyd
Top of the page Bottom of the page
mkultra
Posted 2009-01-08 10:14 PM (#26367 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Tourer

Posts: 374
Tucson, AZ
Lloyd, All i can say is thanks for the answer. Not quite what i expected, but to the point. You have made my mind up. A bit more research and i will be ready. Its hard to come from the HD world into one that is a bit better (not as much B.S.), meaning people like yourself have to create good products partly because of being groundbreakers. Again i appreciate the info.

mike
Top of the page Bottom of the page
david.terry
Posted 2009-01-10 12:38 PM (#26464 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 102
Madison, AL
I just got my bike off the dyno 116 hp 116 trq. Thanks to Tommy and the folks at JPM in Hopkinsville, KY.

Edited by david.terry 2009-01-10 12:52 PM




Attachments
----------------
Attachments David_TVisionDyno.pdf (54KB - 21 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
david.terry
Posted 2009-01-10 4:15 PM (#26468 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 102
Madison, AL
Just came back from a ride, about 80 miles, so far my MPG has shoot back up to around 45 (going by the onboard computer). That was with me hitting the throttle a bit more than usual. The rain, wind, and wet conditions prevented me from extensive "testing" but the bike sounds and feels much different. I didn't need a dyno to tell me that there was more power being produced. For me the cams were well worth the investment.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TimS
Posted 2009-01-11 1:33 AM (#26475 - in reply to #26464)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 810

David,

Please tell us what you have done to your Vision (e.g. what cams, pistons, pipes, airbox, fuel controller, etc.) to get these numbers.

Congrats.

Tim

Top of the page Bottom of the page
david.terry
Posted 2009-01-11 3:22 AM (#26476 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 102
Madison, AL
K&N with the all obstructions removed, Intake mod from Lloyd, cams from Lloyd, Power Commander, stage 1 exhaust upgrade, and Tommy the mechanic from JPM. Originally had theLloyd VFC but the mechanic, Tommy, wanted me to switch to the PC. Tommy has experience with the VFC from Lloyd and had no issue with it, but felt he could do more with the PC.

Just came back from another ride and the bike is louder and there isn't even a hint of popping on decels. Sounds much more like a V-twin than before. Tommy was going to go with Andrews cams and the one thing he is kicking himself for is not measuring the cams he put in my bike. Tommy also has a Vision and is pretty miffed that he doesn't have the one with the most HP, but, that will probably change soon. He will probably do more serious engine work than I would ever want.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TimS
Posted 2009-01-11 9:51 AM (#26484 - in reply to #26476)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 810

Dave,

What Victory map do you have installed, the base RECALL map for the Stage 1 RECALL map?

Thanks for the additional information.  It sounds like your updates turned out really well.

Sincerely,

Tim

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2009-01-11 2:47 PM (#26504 - in reply to #26476)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
Id love to know with your mods what MPG you are getting now... I know you probably wont know for a while. but im curious either way.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
david.terry
Posted 2009-01-17 9:52 PM (#26923 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Cruiser

Posts: 102
Madison, AL
I have the Level 1 map. I don't know if Tommy tinkered with it. It has been to cold and windy for me to ride for any length of time lately. And it will probably be a few weeks before I'm done playing around with the new found performance. I did catch myself zipping around cars like a crotch rocket on a quick afternoon ride. That will have to stop, but it was fun. As soon I have an MPG estimate I'm comfortable with I'll post it. Right now since it has been to cold and windy to ride, I've started the bike up in the garage just to listen to the beautiful engine music. Beats anything on XM right now. One thing is that I do have to give it a little throttle to get it started in the cold. I don't know if this is normal since I've only had the bike since June. (8,000 on it so far).
Top of the page Bottom of the page
coachwes
Posted 2009-01-24 10:33 PM (#27484 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: RE: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Puddle Jumper

Posts: 24
savannah ga
well its my turn and kevin is going to hook me up next week. i will have a nice ride home and will post up about this upgrade as soon as i get in suday night . man i cant wait .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ScoreBo
Posted 2009-01-24 11:46 PM (#27485 - in reply to #25022)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Iron Butt

Posts: 1117
Northeast Ohio
If you have a VFCIII, remember to send it back to Lloyd to be reprogrammed.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kevinx
Posted 2009-01-25 11:16 AM (#27501 - in reply to #27485)
Subject: Re: Vision Cam Dyno RESULTS


Visionary

Posts: 1340
Gainesville Fl Home of the Gators
ScoreBo - 2009-01-24 11:46 PM

If you have a VFCIII, remember to send it back to Lloyd to be reprogrammed.


*LOL* since I am the one that discovered the short coming with the original unit; you can bet he will have the latest code in the VFC3.
Just to let everyone know though. Bikes with ANYT stage map can use the original VFC3 code. It is only bikes with STOCK maps that you can not get enough fuel on the job
Top of the page Bottom of the page