Mythbuster Darksiding
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-22 12:48 PM (#117324)
Subject: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
Let's see if we can get some real data on this.

There are myths submitted on their site, but it isn't getting as much traffic as the does here. I think if we take our debate there, and keep it going, maybe they will do a segment.

You will need to join the forum, and after you do that I started a thread located here:

http://community.discovery.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9701967776/m/5751...

If you are on other forums send them over to the Mythbuster site, because only with large numbers will we be able to get the to do it.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lotzafun
Posted 2012-06-22 1:09 PM (#117326 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Iron Butt

Posts: 935
Rockford, IL
Steven-

Do a post here.... http://mcdarksiders.forumotion.com/

And here...... http://darkside.nwff.info/

And I'm sure there are a few other sites that can be discovered with a google search.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
opas ride
Posted 2012-06-22 2:37 PM (#117333 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 500
Read the article in the new Rider magazine (the one with the Orange Star bike on the cover)...Those that think they are okay with car tires on bike might learn a little from this interesting review.....NEVER catch me with car tires on a bike...Not worth the risk and possible dangers...I am 72, don't ride hard and usually one-up, very little high speed freeway time so my Dunlops are fine for me....Too each his own as they say.....Be safe.......
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-22 2:44 PM (#117334 - in reply to #117333)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada

opas ride - 2012-06-22 12:37 PM Read the article in the new Rider magazine (the one with the Orange Star bike on the cover)...Those that think they are okay with car tires on bike might learn a little from this interesting review.....NEVER catch me with car tires on a bike...Not worth the risk and possible dangers...I am 72, don't ride hard and usually one-up, very little high speed freeway time so my Dunlops are fine for me....Too each his own as they say.....Be safe.......

+1    RIGHT ON !!!

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
johnnyvision
Posted 2012-06-22 4:10 PM (#117337 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 4278
Well I use to run a E3 then the darside and now changing again



(michelin-3.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments michelin-3.jpg (91KB - 2 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-22 5:20 PM (#117339 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
What is there to "myth bust"? It's no myth, people do put car tires on a motorcycle. And you want to know a bigger secret? It's been done since the invention of the motocycle. Give it a rest.

Edited by varyder 2012-06-22 5:23 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-22 6:41 PM (#117345 - in reply to #117333)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
opas ride - 2012-06-22 2:37 PM

Read the article in the new Rider magazine (the one with the Orange Star bike on the cover)...Those that think they are okay with car tires on bike might learn a little from this interesting review.....NEVER catch me with car tires on a bike...Not worth the risk and possible dangers...I am 72, don't ride hard and usually one-up, very little high speed freeway time so my Dunlops are fine for me....Too each his own as they say.....Be safe.......


I have read it, and it was well written, but it contained the typical manufacturer lawyer disclaimers and opinions. It had no empirical information, and writer didn't even bother to do a "real" test drive.

Edited by sgiacci 2012-06-22 6:47 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-22 6:44 PM (#117346 - in reply to #117339)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
varyder - 2012-06-22 5:20 PM

What is there to "myth bust"? It's no myth, people do put car tires on a motorcycle. And you want to know a bigger secret? It's been done since the invention of the motocycle. Give it a rest.


What I would like to see it what it would take to make a car tire fail as if it were on a motorcycle hitting the turns hard.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-22 6:46 PM (#117348 - in reply to #117326)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
Lotzafun - 2012-06-22 1:09 PM

Steven-

Do a post here.... http://mcdarksiders.forumotion.com/

And here...... http://darkside.nwff.info/

And I'm sure there are a few other sites that can be discovered with a google search.


These sites are too one sided, and it would be better for both sides to air their opinions.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-22 6:53 PM (#117349 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
No one with their Own legal dept will ever Recommend anyone to use a car tire on their motorcycle.. Even if the review does it themselves!! Hell i just read on msn.com today where a 11yr old from a little league game is being Sued because the ball hit a lady! $150,000.00 (parents home owners insurance) so i trust reviews on the "Darkside" from a magazine about as much as i trust the government....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
opas ride
Posted 2012-06-22 6:53 PM (#117350 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 500
Hey it's your ass and your bike....Do as you please, but if motorcycle manufacturers thought car tires were okay on bikes they would not be so against it....Most dealers will not install one your bike and I do not do my own....As I said above, It is your body and your bike...do as you please and what ever makes you happy....As for me I am not willing to gamble....Perhaps if I rode on the flat slab for long distances, with heavy loads, maybe I would look at it from a different view.......Choices are what makes America great for now....Not sure about the future.......
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-22 7:00 PM (#117351 - in reply to #117350)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
opas ride - 2012-06-22 6:53 PM

Hey it's your ass and your bike....Do as you please, but if motorcycle manufacturers thought car tires were okay on bikes they would not be so against it....Most dealers will not install one your bike and I do not do my own....As I said above, It is your body and your bike...do as you please and what ever makes you happy....As for me I am not willing to gamble....Perhaps if I rode on the flat slab for long distances, with heavy loads, maybe I would look at it from a different view.......Choices are what makes America great for now....Not sure about the future.......


Manufactures also put in their owners manual to obey legal speed limits for personal safety of you and others, but then (1 example) suzuki hyabusa can almost go 200 mph for a street legal motorcycle. and the Dealers who wont install a car tire have No problems selling one of these 200mph bikes to a teen ager... a weak example but still ...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-22 7:20 PM (#117354 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
People, put the rebuts on Mythbusters site. That is the point of the thread!!!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-22 7:30 PM (#117355 - in reply to #117351)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA

Arkainzeye - 2012-06-22 8:00 PM opas ride - 2012-06-22 6:53 PM Hey it's your ass and your bike....Do as you please, but if motorcycle manufacturers thought car tires were okay on bikes they would not be so against it....Most dealers will not install one your bike and I do not do my own....As I said above, It is your body and your bike...do as you please and what ever makes you happy....As for me I am not willing to gamble....Perhaps if I rode on the flat slab for long distances, with heavy loads, maybe I would look at it from a different view.......Choices are what makes America great for now....Not sure about the future....... Manufactures also put in their owners manual to obey legal speed limits for personal safety of you and others, but then (1 example) suzuki hyabusa can almost go 200 mph for a street legal motorcycle. and the Dealers who wont install a car tire have No problems selling one of these 200mph bikes to a teen ager... a weak example but still ...

 Excellent point in my book.  I could go on about a sundry of things that we as humans, or citizens can do legally, but in the wrong application can be harmful or downright deadly.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-22 7:48 PM (#117357 - in reply to #117355)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
varyder - 2012-06-22 7:30 PM

Arkainzeye - 2012-06-22 8:00 PM opas ride - 2012-06-22 6:53 PM Hey it's your ass and your bike....Do as you please, but if motorcycle manufacturers thought car tires were okay on bikes they would not be so against it....Most dealers will not install one your bike and I do not do my own....As I said above, It is your body and your bike...do as you please and what ever makes you happy....As for me I am not willing to gamble....Perhaps if I rode on the flat slab for long distances, with heavy loads, maybe I would look at it from a different view.......Choices are what makes America great for now....Not sure about the future....... Manufactures also put in their owners manual to obey legal speed limits for personal safety of you and others, but then (1 example) suzuki hyabusa can almost go 200 mph for a street legal motorcycle. and the Dealers who wont install a car tire have No problems selling one of these 200mph bikes to a teen ager... a weak example but still ...

?Excellent point in my book. ?I could go on about a sundry of things that we as humans, or citizens can do legally, but in the wrong application can be harmful or downright deadly.



+1
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-22 8:01 PM (#117361 - in reply to #117354)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA

sgiacci - 2012-06-22 8:20 PM People, put the rebuts on Mythbusters site. That is the point of the thread!!!

I'm sorry, I wish I knew how to play well with others.  I don't know what I'm rebutting, I don't think it is a myth that people use car tires on motorcycles, nor do I believe they go up in flames if they do.  Unless you take every single bike in the world that has a car tire on it and an exact replication of bikes and riders without car tires and put them through exactly the same condition and circumstance and record exact data, this is all blah, blah, blah.  What are you wanting Myth Busters do?  What is the myth that you are trying to dispute?

Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-22 8:22 PM (#117362 - in reply to #117361)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada
varyder - 2012-06-22 6:01 PM

I'm sorry, I wish I knew how to play well with others. 

SMART ...

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-25 9:49 AM (#117558 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.



Edited by Kelvininin 2012-06-25 9:52 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-25 10:35 AM (#117562 - in reply to #117558)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 7:49 AM Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system. For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions. The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing. Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try. And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory. The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.

very SMART

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-25 11:18 AM (#117564 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
I'll give in to the "need" of a car tire for the Alaskian trip. Now that Rollin' has made the trip I would like to know if he felt it was necassary? Not for sake of an argument, but from a practibility stand-point. What would be the vice of using new E-3s for the same trip?

Edited by varyder 2012-06-25 11:26 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-25 12:32 PM (#117567 - in reply to #117558)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.



my good year assurance fuel max weighs 17lbs. so your saying a 180/60r-16 E3 is ALOT less weight than 17lbs? and will cause my suspension to break down? Does anyone know what a New E3 weighs? When i had my good year assurance in my hand it felt NO heavier than the dunlop i was taking off...

i guess the past 7 years of me riding the darkside on 3 different bikes, i must have been cheating death the 3 times i rode us129 (dragon) and the 16 states i rode through.. I bet if i didnt trade those bikes in with the car tire i would have surely went down in flames with in a few weeks.. My buddy on his GoldWing with over 80000 miles of darksiding, is probably going to crash any day now.. i should probably say good bye now while he is still around.. i wonder how many rear suspensions he went through since he was using a car tire.. I bet his drive shaft is ready to snap any day now.. for all the guys doing the Darkside with only a few thousand miles you better go back to the MC NOW!! do NOT pay any attention to the decades of people using car tires on their bikes. and never ever listen to someone that has tens of thousands of miles on a car tire.. they are Lieing.. its all myth!

If someone has like my buddy 80000 miles and 95% of those were with a car tire.. its B.S. it CAN NOT BE TRUE. because he shouldnt be alive. so that fact that he is alive and did Not go down in flames only proves he is lieing about using a car tire for all those miles... magazines with legal depts proven this... it CAN NOT BE DONE.. please save everyone you see with a car tire! you will be a Saint by saving a life!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-25 1:23 PM (#117571 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
The myth is that car tires are better on motorcycles.

Why isn't anyone posting in the other forum?



Edited by sgiacci 2012-06-25 1:23 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-25 1:27 PM (#117572 - in reply to #117558)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.




Until you show use some facts (yawn) or are willing to take this debate to a group that has the resources to review this matter, than your droning is nothing but diatribe.

Edited by sgiacci 2012-06-25 1:27 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-25 1:30 PM (#117573 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
Yawn
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-25 3:02 PM (#117574 - in reply to #117564)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
varyder - 2012-06-25 9:18 AM

I'll give in to the "need" of a car tire for the Alaskian trip. Now that Rollin' has made the trip I would like to know if he felt it was necassary? Not for sake of an argument, but from a practibility stand-point. What would be the vice of using new E-3s for the same trip?


Rollin' and his Alaskan trip is the only one so far that has come up with a semi-legitimate reason to run a car tire on a bike. The rest are just cheap bastards who bought a $20K bike and want to skimp on maintenance.

Edited by Kelvininin 2012-06-25 3:05 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-25 3:15 PM (#117576 - in reply to #117567)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
Arkainzeye - 2012-06-25 10:32 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.



my good year assurance fuel max weighs 17lbs. so your saying a 180/60r-16 E3 is ALOT less weight than 17lbs? and will cause my suspension to break down? Does anyone know what a New E3 weighs? When i had my good year assurance in my hand it felt NO heavier than the dunlop i was taking off...

i guess the past 7 years of me riding the darkside on 3 different bikes, i must have been cheating death the 3 times i rode us129 (dragon) and the 16 states i rode through.. I bet if i didnt trade those bikes in with the car tire i would have surely went down in flames with in a few weeks.. My buddy on his GoldWing with over 80000 miles of darksiding, is probably going to crash any day now.. i should probably say good bye now while he is still around.. i wonder how many rear suspensions he went through since he was using a car tire.. I bet his drive shaft is ready to snap any day now.. for all the guys doing the Darkside with only a few thousand miles you better go back to the MC NOW!! do NOT pay any attention to the decades of people using car tires on their bikes. and never ever listen to someone that has tens of thousands of miles on a car tire.. they are Lieing.. its all myth!

If someone has like my buddy 80000 miles and 95% of those were with a car tire.. its B.S. it CAN NOT BE TRUE. because he shouldnt be alive. so that fact that he is alive and did Not go down in flames only proves he is lieing about using a car tire for all those miles... magazines with legal depts proven this... it CAN NOT BE DONE.. please save everyone you see with a car tire! you will be a Saint by saving a life!



Ahh I love it... Using the "legal department" argument to discount hundreds and thousands of man hours for R&D, testing, development, more testing, working with the vendor, quality control, working with wheel designers, more testing...

This whole argument reminds me of the events leading up to the Challenger explosion. Oh sure, every other launch was just fine, so this one launch a cooler temp, even though there was no data of the o-ring failures at the cooler temps, everything should be just fine...

Its not the if, its then when. If the "when" never comes for you, great! For me, and many others, saving a few bucks to compromise safety, handling, and reliability isn't enough. You have your friend with 1000000000000000000000 miles on his GW with a car tire, and I have my friend with the lightsided Geo Metro who laps the lead car in the Indy 500 while getting 300 mpg!

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-25 3:17 PM (#117577 - in reply to #117572)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
sgiacci - 2012-06-25 11:27 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.




Until you show use some facts (yawn) or are willing to take this debate to a group that has the resources to review this matter, than your droning is nothing but diatribe.



And like wise sir. The very fact the manufactures see no value in this pursuit speaks the loudest to me.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-25 7:37 PM (#117606 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
Im glad you werent named Christoper Columbus 500+ years ago, or i wouldnt be riding to sturgis in 2 weeks! (im joking)...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-26 8:32 AM (#117637 - in reply to #117577)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 3:17 PM

sgiacci - 2012-06-25 11:27 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.




Until you show use some facts (yawn) or are willing to take this debate to a group that has the resources to review this matter, than your droning is nothing but diatribe.



And like wise sir. The very fact the manufactures see no value in this pursuit speaks the loudest to me.


I have, but it would seem you don't know who the US Department of Transportation is. Manufactures are such great resources for our safety concerns, and they have been so dependable about testing. If it wasn't for government regulations (back to the US Department of Transportation people) manufactures would happily kill more people than they already have just to make a buck.

Lets list some of those great things big companies have done for us:

The grand daddy of them all is Winston Salem (yea I now it isn't car or bike related), knowing that cigarettes caused cancer and are highly addictive, hid those findings, telling us that cigarettes are the great social thing to do - how many millions did they kill, and how many billions did they make? Yes they did do the testing, and that is why they can now be held accountable in court.

The automobile industry refused to implement safety devices until Nader publicized Unsafe at Any Speed, and the US DOT (that is short for Department of Transportation) stepped in and instated regulations.

Let's not forget what a great job Ford and Firestone did with their testing SUV rollovers, how many people had to die and how many lawsuits did it take before they and Ford did something about it?

How about the exploding Pintos and Crown Victorias?

Chevy's engines breaking away from the frames, and they knew about the problem 2 years before the recall.

Ford seatbelts detach in crashes, and the funny part is that this happened in the 70s. Back then there wasn't any regulation to wear a seatbelt.

GM's collapsing tailgates, and this one I experienced personally. When the cables failed on me I was still recovering from a motorcycle crash (that bike has a motorcycle tire on it), and the tailgate slammed my busted leg. Luckily I had a one of those new removable casts on, and it took most of the impact.

Why hasn't the US DOT banned the use of car tires on motorcycles???


Now grow a pair, and take this debate to the Mythbuster forum or are you afraid that you could be proven wrong?


Edited by sgiacci 2012-06-26 8:34 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 9:55 AM (#117642 - in reply to #117637)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
sgiacci - 2012-06-26 6:32 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 3:17 PM

sgiacci - 2012-06-25 11:27 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.




Until you show use some facts (yawn) or are willing to take this debate to a group that has the resources to review this matter, than your droning is nothing but diatribe.



And like wise sir. The very fact the manufactures see no value in this pursuit speaks the loudest to me.


I have, but it would seem you don't know who the US Department of Transportation is. Manufactures are such great resources for our safety concerns, and they have been so dependable about testing. If it wasn't for government regulations (back to the US Department of Transportation people) manufactures would happily kill more people than they already have just to make a buck.

Lets list some of those great things big companies have done for us:

The grand daddy of them all is Winston Salem (yea I now it isn't car or bike related), knowing that cigarettes caused cancer and are highly addictive, hid those findings, telling us that cigarettes are the great social thing to do - how many millions did they kill, and how many billions did they make? Yes they did do the testing, and that is why they can now be held accountable in court.

The automobile industry refused to implement safety devices until Nader publicized Unsafe at Any Speed, and the US DOT (that is short for Department of Transportation) stepped in and instated regulations.

Let's not forget what a great job Ford and Firestone did with their testing SUV rollovers, how many people had to die and how many lawsuits did it take before they and Ford did something about it?

How about the exploding Pintos and Crown Victorias?

Chevy's engines breaking away from the frames, and they knew about the problem 2 years before the recall.

Ford seatbelts detach in crashes, and the funny part is that this happened in the 70s. Back then there wasn't any regulation to wear a seatbelt.

GM's collapsing tailgates, and this one I experienced personally. When the cables failed on me I was still recovering from a motorcycle crash (that bike has a motorcycle tire on it), and the tailgate slammed my busted leg. Luckily I had a one of those new removable casts on, and it took most of the impact.

Why hasn't the US DOT banned the use of car tires on motorcycles???


Now grow a pair, and take this debate to the Mythbuster forum or are you afraid that you could be proven wrong?



So now that I have dismissed your personal opinion arguments, your legal department arguments, you are now going to make this a "big corporation argument."

Are you that desperate to justify skimping on maintenance on a $20K bike?

Again, there is no myth to bust. A CT is not designed to be used in place of a MT, and as such will never, ever, in a million years, out perform the rubber specified for a motorcycle. Since this isn't a myth, its truth, I can't even say "myth busted" because there is no myth.

As far as the DOT is concerned. You the owner are putting car tire on your bike assuming all liability for a potential accident, personally. DOT doesn't tell owners of the products what to do, they tell the makers. DOT also doest not design, they leave that work the experts, the makers.

But mathematically darksiders represent less than 1% of all motorcycle riders... Accidents evolving darksiding are such an statistical insignificance, it won't even pop up on DOTs radar. Unlike darksiding the Pinto, GM's saddle mount tanks, the rolling over explorers, ect, ect, ect, represented a much larger statistical representation of that segments cross section, making the situations with said products statistically significant. Plus these were the manufacturers mistakes.

Why don't you just admit you care more about saving a buck than the actually handling of your bike, and the potential extra wear and tear to the suspension components?


I still blows my mind that you actually think you know more than the engineers and designers who put these products together. I am all about tinkering, but I tinker to improve the ride, not sacrifice it to save some money.




Edited by Kelvininin 2012-06-26 9:59 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
opas ride
Posted 2012-06-26 10:36 AM (#117643 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 500
Both you guys have way too much time on your hands.......Let it go and move on!!!!!! JMHO
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-26 11:11 AM (#117645 - in reply to #117642)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada

mathematically darksiders represent less than 1% of all motorcycle riders... Accidents evolving darksiding are such an statistical insignificance, it won't even pop up on DOTs radar. Unlike darksiding the Pinto, GM's saddle mount tanks, the rolling over explorers, ect, ect, ect, represented a much larger statistical representation of that segments cross section, making the situations with said products statistically significant. Plus these were the manufacturers mistakes. Why don't you just admit you care more about saving a buck than the actually handling of your bike, and the potential extra wear and tear to the suspension components? I still blows my mind that you actually think you know more than the engineers and designers who put these products together. I am all about tinkering, but I tinker to improve the ride, not sacrifice it to save some money.

That's the BEST of this whole discussion. Over my years of biking, I have read a number of articles by TIRE ENGINEERS who all said "Don't do it !!!" - and I would rather believe an 'expert' than someone who has 'tried it and it works'.

Bike manufacturers would put them on new bikes if there was ANY real improvement over properly designed bike tires (other than 'mileage'). But they don't. And there is no 'conspiracy' among the makers in case you still believe the moon landing was a hoax.

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 12:15 PM (#117646 - in reply to #117637)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
sgiacci - 2012-06-26 8:32 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 3:17 PM

sgiacci - 2012-06-25 11:27 AM

Kelvininin - 2012-06-25 9:49 AM

Thinking about this more... The argument about the OM states to follow legal speed limits is weak at best. There is a big difference between operating a vehicle above the posted speed limit and applying equipment to a system that wasn't designed to work with said system.

For example. A car tire weighs more than a motorcycle tire, sometimes significantly more, by mounting a CT into on to a motorcycle, one is changing the unsprung mass of that portion of the motorcycles suspension system. Changing the unsprung mass of any suspension system can and will have a negative consequence on the suspension system as a whole. For starters one can expect premature suspension component wear, wheel chatter, unpredictable handling, and possibly even sudden loss of control in some rode conditions.

The other thing to consider is most CT have a tread depth twice or more than a MT. This extra tread depth will allow for unanticipated lateral movement in turns as the tread flexes on the reduced sidewall contact patch in the turns. I can't see that as being a positive thing.

Of course the Darksiders argument will remain "you have to try it to appreciate it." No actually one doesn't have to "try" it to appreciate it. All one has to really do is appreciate the amount of effort, and understand how systems work to appreciate it, or in this case, dismiss it as something one does not need to try.

And I agree, this is no Myth, thus there is no Myth to bust. This is about less than 1% of all motorcycle riders wanting to save a few bucks, handling, reliability, and safety be damned. But really, if you really wanted to save a few bucks, there are much cheaper bikes out there as opposed to Victory.

The other argument that all motorcycles use to have car tires... Have you seen the car tires of that said era? Said tires of that era actually resemble modern motorcycle tires as opposed to modern car tires.




Until you show use some facts (yawn) or are willing to take this debate to a group that has the resources to review this matter, than your droning is nothing but diatribe.



And like wise sir. The very fact the manufactures see no value in this pursuit speaks the loudest to me.


I have, but it would seem you don't know who the US Department of Transportation is. Manufactures are such great resources for our safety concerns, and they have been so dependable about testing. If it wasn't for government regulations (back to the US Department of Transportation people) manufactures would happily kill more people than they already have just to make a buck.

Lets list some of those great things big companies have done for us:

The grand daddy of them all is Winston Salem (yea I now it isn't car or bike related), knowing that cigarettes caused cancer and are highly addictive, hid those findings, telling us that cigarettes are the great social thing to do - how many millions did they kill, and how many billions did they make? Yes they did do the testing, and that is why they can now be held accountable in court.

The automobile industry refused to implement safety devices until Nader publicized Unsafe at Any Speed, and the US DOT (that is short for Department of Transportation) stepped in and instated regulations.

Let's not forget what a great job Ford and Firestone did with their testing SUV rollovers, how many people had to die and how many lawsuits did it take before they and Ford did something about it?

How about the exploding Pintos and Crown Victorias?

Chevy's engines breaking away from the frames, and they knew about the problem 2 years before the recall.

Ford seatbelts detach in crashes, and the funny part is that this happened in the 70s. Back then there wasn't any regulation to wear a seatbelt.

GM's collapsing tailgates, and this one I experienced personally. When the cables failed on me I was still recovering from a motorcycle crash (that bike has a motorcycle tire on it), and the tailgate slammed my busted leg. Luckily I had a one of those new removable casts on, and it took most of the impact.

Why hasn't the US DOT banned the use of car tires on motorcycles???


Now grow a pair, and take this debate to the Mythbuster forum or are you afraid that you could be proven wrong?


get this when i first went to the dark side back in like 07 i asked a bunch of questions before i wasted the money.. 1) asked the PA inspection place i go to if i was even allowed to do this and yet Pass inspection.. he said he honestly didnt know.. lol so he said he would contact them and find out.. a few days later he told me that.. under pa inspection law the only thing a tire must have is a D.O.T. stamping on the sidewall. there was No rule about a car tire Not being allowed on the wheel. But then the guy told me you might want to make sure your insurance company would cover you if you got into a accident (even if not my fault) i called Nationwide who i had at that time and they said they had NO rules against a brand or Type of tire.. then the insurance company fell back on the Inspection station saying, IF the it passes PA state inspection it met their requirements.. Since then i have been with geico progressive and now state farm and i contacted each of them, so i do Not want to avoid my coverage all for a tire.. and each of them said the same thing.... if it passes PA inspection it met their requirements...

side note in PA, they failed me years ago for having turn signals that were not only too small but TOO CLOSE t the brake light.. so Pa can be picky... They also can fail you if you inspection Plate (accessory for your sticker) is Not welded or Riveted to the bike.. When i first went to the dark side on my kawasaki vulcan 2000 i thought it was the craziest thing i ever heard of and i was nervous.. after i did it, i laughed about how nervous i was about something i Never tried before....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 12:27 PM (#117648 - in reply to #117645)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
donetracey - 2012-06-26 11:11 AM

Bike manufacturers would put them on new bikes if there was ANY real improvement over properly designed bike tires (other than 'mileage'). But they don't. And there is no 'conspiracy' among the makers in case you still believe the moon landing was a hoax.

?




Hell, Lloyds cams are an improvement in power and would give Victory bragging rights over even GoldWings for Hp and Ftlbs at the rear wheel. But Victory doesnt do that even though that would be a improvement. are Lloyds cams a BAD idea because they didnt come stock from the factory and Victory doesnt recommend them to their customers? Lloyd is a master mind with Vics is he wrong because the Manufacture doesnt use cams "Hotter" Cams? point being the Manufacture is in business to make as much profit as possible. Look at over the years some of the car companys that were cheap with their parts..

Or how about this one, the Manufactures and Master Engineers that design AND TEST cars only to have Recalls later.... Hell we have a toyota that had a recall because the freaking gas pedal would stick!! the manufacture made that product and they passed the tested buy DOT for it to be sold to the public... what does that mean? Nothing.... i have about as much faith in the D.O.T. as the people that made my gas pedal stick, of the defective Honda V6 transmission that is going through a law suit because you can seize in on the interstate and be killed.. they all were designed by highly educated people, by Big name companies! And we trusted them just the same. So basically if the manufacture makes it its "Safe" ? yeah right.... if that was the case we would have no lemon laws but hey... i could be wrong.... =)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 1:07 PM (#117649 - in reply to #117648)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
Your logic is flawed. Lloyd doesn't have to worry about one thing that Victory does... Emissions. Victory has to tune its bikes to meet emission and maximize power within what the EPA says the bike is allowed to pump out its tail pipe.

This has resulted in the picky closed loop fuel injection, detuned engines, cat cons, ext. Lloyd is a master of unlocking the potential that Victory put into the engines but limits due to the EPA.

In fact if cars and trucks didn't have to abide by EPA standers, they would get better miles and produce more power, a lot better mileage and more power. Just like everything else, the emissions equipment is paid for is horsepower, some times as much as a 20-30% of total power output.

Are you fucking kidding me? Recalls happen. They happen on everything man made. An auto maker, making a mistake and owning up for it still isn't the same as someone replacing critical safety equipment just to save a few bucks, completely neglecting the hundreds of thousands of hours put into developing and implementing products.

Maybe I will do that same if I ever get into an accident. Those pesky airbags are expensive, and after all, the folks that designed them don't know what they are doing. In fact if I ever have to replace an air bag, I will do so with a hefty bag, a quarter stick of dynamite, and just hang the detonator off the front bumper. Sounds like a plan and should only cost a few hundred bucks ranter than a few thousand...

Let me know when you darksiders actually have a legitimate excuse to compromise your bikes rideability to save a few bucks. All thats offered are lame excuse to skimp on maintenance of a $20K bike.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 1:28 PM (#117651 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
Do you mean compromise rideability like the youtube videos of a goldwing wth a car tire Riding so fast in the turns the other bike with a camera could barely keep up with him? It does sure looks like his riding wasnt compromised... I wonder why he didnt go down in a ball flames? I wonder why the motorcycle with a motorcycle tire could not keep up with him? According to the people that have never tried a car tire on bike a motorcycle tires for superior in every possible way..

the funniest part of the darkside talks are. the people who NEVER done it have the strongest opinions. Meanwhile this has been done for decades.. (not weeks or months) Decades... lol reminds me of the people that knew the earth was flat and said you were crazy for thinking other wise... I wonder what ever happened to that guy that dared to think outside of the box.... it could always come down to this.. if you dont like the darkside.. guess what... Dont do it... lol i think its really that simple. but for someone to say it cant be done and you will die trying it is funny.. meanwhile the people on this board have TENS of Thousands of miles on the very tire people said would end them.. all because some engineer didnt recommend it..

Edited by Arkainzeye 2012-06-26 1:34 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-26 1:42 PM (#117653 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
Just because a skilled rider on ct bike can outrun a not-so-skilled rider on mt bike, doesn't make the bike or tire superior.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
opas ride
Posted 2012-06-26 1:45 PM (#117654 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 500
This silly-ass debate over rear tires is a riot....Far more BS than the stuff Romney and Obama are slinging at each other!!!!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 2:20 PM (#117657 - in reply to #117651)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
Arkainzeye - 2012-06-26 11:28 AM

the funniest part of the darkside talks are. the people who NEVER done it have the strongest opinions.


This is because we are one: Not so cheap that we are willing to sacrifice, rideability, reliability, and safety to save maybe a grand or two over the life of the bike.

And two: We are not stupid enough to actually justify it in our own heads.


So laughable. Hey I saw it on a youtube video so it must be true!

Certainly youtube counts as solid, undeniable, indisputable, statistically significant, calibrated instrument collected data.

Amazing... Please, keep digging your whole.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 2:23 PM (#117658 - in reply to #117654)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
opas ride - 2012-06-26 11:45 AM

This silly-ass debate over rear tires is a riot....Far more BS than the stuff Romney and Obama are slinging at each other!!!!



No doubt!! I found the shit flies the furtherst when you can't back up your claims.


Oh By the way, I was getting 350 mpg on my lightsided F150 this morning! Fucking amazing! I should have done this years ago. I have't have to put gas in my truck for the past two months! I should make a youtube video of it so that I have solid statistically significant data!

Edited by Kelvininin 2012-06-26 2:28 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 2:25 PM (#117659 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
SO BASICALLY yous saying the youtube video was all studio tricks then? I mean this guy on this goldwing flying through the dragon with a motorcycle behind him was probably actually hired by the car tire people to promote the use of a car tire on a motorcycle.. LOL gotta love the people that say it cant be done even through they see it being done... Like a goldwing rider in my group.. he said there is no way you can handle the devil triangle in ohio with a freaking car tire. well i lead the ride (two up) and afterwards he wouldnt look me in the eyes. its hard for people to learn the world is not flat.. i understand that now. but back to the youtube car tire people.. Is there any way i could PLEASE get in on some of that Corp goodyear tire money you guys are getting from posting your videos on youtube? comeon share....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 2:35 PM (#117661 - in reply to #117659)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
Arkainzeye - 2012-06-26 12:25 PM

SO BASICALLY yous saying the youtube video was all studio tricks then? I mean this guy on this goldwing flying through the dragon with a motorcycle behind him was probably actually hired by the car tire people to promote the use of a car tire on a motorcycle.. LOL gotta love the people that say it cant be done even through they see it being done... Like a goldwing rider in my group.. he said there is no way you can handle the devil triangle in ohio with a freaking car tire. well i lead the ride (two up) and afterwards he wouldnt look me in the eyes. its hard for people to learn the world is not flat.. i understand that now. but back to the youtube car tire people.. Is there any way i could PLEASE get in on some of that Corp goodyear tire money you guys are getting from posting your videos on youtube? comeon share....


Don't get me wrong... I am not saying it can't be done (car tire on a motorcycle). I am just saying I am not such a cheap fucking bastard that I am going to compromise my own safety, those around me, as well as the ability of my bike, potential reliability and longevity of my bike, just to safe a few bucks.

Plus I fully appreciate that care tire was not only not designed to be put into motorcycle duty, but also the bead mounting surface areas are entirely different. A care tire has less that 1/3 the bead mounting surface area on a motorcycle rim, when compared to the motorcycle tire.

Much like the space shuttles challenger's ill fated launch, its not "if", its "when." Just like with everything else when someone tries to force something into a duty it wasn't designed for, its only a matter of time before something goes wrong.

Hows that saying go? Oh yeah... Use the right tool for the right job.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
jeffmack
Posted 2012-06-26 2:39 PM (#117662 - in reply to #117645)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Iron Butt

Posts: 623
donetracey - 2012-06-26 11:11 AM

mathematically darksiders represent less than 1% of all motorcycle riders... Accidents evolving darksiding are such an statistical insignificance, it won't even pop up on DOTs radar. Unlike darksiding the Pinto, GM's saddle mount tanks, the rolling over explorers, ect, ect, ect, represented a much larger statistical representation of that segments cross section, making the situations with said products statistically significant. Plus these were the manufacturers mistakes. Why don't you just admit you care more about saving a buck than the actually handling of your bike, and the potential extra wear and tear to the suspension components? I still blows my mind that you actually think you know more than the engineers and designers who put these products together. I am all about tinkering, but I tinker to improve the ride, not sacrifice it to save some money.

That's the BEST of this whole discussion. Over my years of biking, I have read a number of articles by TIRE ENGINEERS who all said "Don't do it !!!" - and I would rather believe an 'expert' than someone who has 'tried it and it works'.

Bike manufacturers would put them on new bikes if there was ANY real improvement over properly designed bike tires (other than 'mileage'). But they don't. And there is no 'conspiracy' among the makers in case you still believe the moon landing was a hoax.

?



It's called job security. Do you really expect anyone in any business to promote using a 99.00 part over a 269.00 part??? Let me guess you buy victory bike cleaner and oil filters too???
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 2:42 PM (#117663 - in reply to #117662)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
jeffmack - 2012-06-26 12:39 PM

It's called job security. Do you really expect anyone in any business to promote using a 99.00 part over a 269.00 part??? Let me guess you buy victory bike cleaner and oil filters too???



DING DING DING!!! We have another winner!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 3:39 PM (#117665 - in reply to #117662)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
jeffmack - 2012-06-26 2:39 PM

donetracey - 2012-06-26 11:11 AM

mathematically darksiders represent less than 1% of all motorcycle riders... Accidents evolving darksiding are such an statistical insignificance, it won't even pop up on DOTs radar. Unlike darksiding the Pinto, GM's saddle mount tanks, the rolling over explorers, ect, ect, ect, represented a much larger statistical representation of that segments cross section, making the situations with said products statistically significant. Plus these were the manufacturers mistakes. Why don't you just admit you care more about saving a buck than the actually handling of your bike, and the potential extra wear and tear to the suspension components? I still blows my mind that you actually think you know more than the engineers and designers who put these products together. I am all about tinkering, but I tinker to improve the ride, not sacrifice it to save some money.

That's the BEST of this whole discussion. Over my years of biking, I have read a number of articles by TIRE ENGINEERS who all said "Don't do it !!!" - and I would rather believe an 'expert' than someone who has 'tried it and it works'.

Bike manufacturers would put them on new bikes if there was ANY real improvement over properly designed bike tires (other than 'mileage'). But they don't. And there is no 'conspiracy' among the makers in case you still believe the moon landing was a hoax.

?



It's called job security. Do you really expect anyone in any business to promote using a 99.00 part over a 269.00 part??? Let me guess you buy victory bike cleaner and oil filters too???


AMEN!!!

also noticed do you think a motorcycle mag or anything else motorcycle related would promote a product or Type of product that would hurt the sales of the very people that PAY to advertise with them? Not to many good year car tire ad's in motorcycle mags these days.. (dont bite the hand that feeds you) .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-26 3:49 PM (#117668 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
Living in the world of "wink, wink, nod, nod" is such a wonderful place.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 3:50 PM (#117669 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
AMEN INDEED!!!

It's a racket I tell ya...

Just completely and totally neglect the fact that a car tire was never designed to be used on a motorcycle, roll on to its side walls, the seating bead areas are different from a CT to MT, in fact the bead mating areas don't line up well at all, a car tire weighs more, there are plenty of youtube videos out there to prove it works, and all the experts from both the tire and motorcycle manufactures say don't do it...

And you are in!

A cheap bastards replacement for a real motorcycle tire. It rides like crap, handles like crap, corners like crap, but its cheap!

Top of the page Bottom of the page
pollolittle
Posted 2012-06-26 4:10 PM (#117671 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2027
Brighton, TN
Yeah, my only injection to a hotly contemptable bunch, would be the ride quality. Currently using Dunlop E3 and will do so, because i am able to remove my hands and steer anywhere i want to go nust by shifting weight. Nice sweepers no problem, it handles smoothly with minimal input. I like that feature. What i understand about a car tire is more input and not as easily no hands manuevering. Me. NO likey that idea
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 4:11 PM (#117672 - in reply to #117669)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA


A cheap bastards replacement for a real motorcycle tire. It rides like crap, handles like crap, corners like crap, but its cheap!



and you would know this from what experience? oh thats right you have NO experience.. lol

also just noticed something related to Myth busters... myth busters debunked the myth about using a cellphone at a gas station pump.. But yet even after the debunking the DOT and Federal gov Ban you for using a cellphone at a gas station while your pumping fuel. My local gas station even has a sign that says they are allowed to turn the pumps OFF if you dont follow the rules..

so who is right and who is wrong? does the DOT actually know what they were talking about related to the cellphone useage at the pumps? Did myth busters PROVE its all B.S.? and if it is B.S. you can still get in trouble by not following the rules they made that were proven false in the first place..
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 4:17 PM (#117673 - in reply to #117672)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
The best part about this is you guys get so damned worked up about it...

A slow day at work for me results in a shit ton of entertainment for many...


Oh and of this afternoon, my lightsided truck is now getting 450 mpg!!! Amazing. I will make a youtube video so you know it will be true.

Edited by Kelvininin 2012-06-26 4:19 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 4:40 PM (#117675 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
I dont know about anyone else but im not worked up.. anyone that knows me personally would be laughing rightnow. especially my old Kaw forum members that some are on here... they know i never did the "follow the leader". on a side note i thought it was a great discussion i would be lieing if i said i didnt learn a few things... I never take this personally as im Not selling tires.. lol i just always have had issues with someone (not you) telling me what i can and cant do.. (you dont ride a real motorcycle usless you ride a Harley!) I love this forum! so many people doing mods etc. if you choose to do it you will find detailed info on here. if you choose its not for you well thats good too! This place is not short on options!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-26 5:54 PM (#117680 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
As long as there has been motorcycle forums, there has been debates on a sundry of topics. I find it interesting that folks will bring up totally unrelated examples in attempt to prove the point of a car tire on a bike or strictly using a motorcycle tires.

After reading all that I can on this topic I still come to the same conclusion, without argument in my mind. But because it has to do motorcycles and riding I like to continue to participate in the discussions. The bottom line is that those who want to ride with a car tire will do so despite any rebuttal. It is easy for those who do choose to ride a CT to point out that those who do not wish to partake have no clue what we are talking about. This alone is another poor rebuttal, there are hundred of things that I will never try that others partake in, and those to I have my reason. Some of things are obvisous and lesson are learned well not to try them, often with regret for those that do. But on the same token, there are those things that folks have good results with. Its easy to say, let's agree to disagree. But without these futile threads of articulating one's stance in rebuttal to another's opinion, where would the content be. These seem to be the hottest threads on any forum.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 6:32 PM (#117683 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
We need a new thread. What oil do you use while using a CT.!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gray rider
Posted 2012-06-26 6:42 PM (#117685 - in reply to #117683)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 394
Tucson, AZ
Well, I for one use Rotella with my CT.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 6:54 PM (#117686 - in reply to #117685)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
Gray rider - 2012-06-26 6:42 PM

Well, I for one use Rotella with my CT.


there you go Gray rider!! Spark that torch!! lol

Im using amsoil "clutch slipping formula" and a Good year triple Assurance Fuel Max. lol
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 7:52 PM (#117689 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
I'll agree to disagree.

I do however strongly believe the "you have to try to like" augment is extremely weak from the technical standpoint. There is just too much miss match from the profile to the bead seat area.... To me, its a red neck, chicken wire, duct tape, approach to a motorcycle tire. Not my thing. I am far from Mr. Safety but my riding style would not even begin to permit the use of anything other than the proper rubber.

You don't have to try meth to know its bad... Same thing with a CT... If it's your drug great! I prefer a very strong IPA, the kind bitter enough to pucker your butt hole.

As for oil, I have used Vic oil but am switching to Rotella, and I use the life time oil filter. In fact I used the life time oil filter on my KP before the Vision.

I burned Amsoil in my last import bike, and it didn't like it one bit... I will stick with the blended stuff.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 8:17 PM (#117690 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
just wondering what is the Micro filteration rating on those life time oil filters vs say a Vic oem filter? My dealer gives me a Great deal on Oem vic filters and since my 11 vision has a 5000 mile Oil Change interval it would take me 20+(or over 100K miles) oil changes to break even if that life time oil filter is $140 still.

Ive been interested in those filters. i just never heard any Tech specs on them. when i had my 08 vision i changed the oil alot more often, not so much now..

Edited by Arkainzeye 2012-06-26 8:19 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-26 8:26 PM (#117693 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada
Now you got me going again. WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH ALL - well, many OF YOU ???????????

DON'T BE SO CHEAP. Cheap Tires. Cheap Oil. Do-it-yourself.

And then you BITCH because your Dealer is out-of-business. And you BITCH because someone does something different than you.

Take your bike to the DEALER and have him put 'some-kind-of-oil' in it, and then change your worn tires for 'some-kind-of-bike-tire'.

Spend the time you will save NOT bitching - screwing your lady or riding your bike. Damn I hate OIL threads ....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 8:42 PM (#117695 - in reply to #117693)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
donetracey - 2012-06-26 8:26 PM

Now you got me going again. WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH ALL - well, many OF YOU ???????????

DON'T BE SO CHEAP. Cheap Tires. Cheap Oil. Do-it-yourself.

And then you BITCH because your Dealer is out-of-business. And you BITCH because someone does something different than you.

Take your bike to the DEALER and have him put 'some-kind-of-oil' in it, and then change your worn tires for 'some-kind-of-bike-tire'.

Spend the time you will save NOT bitching - screwing your lady or riding your bike. Damn I hate OIL threads ....


yeah thats a great idea.. send my bike to the freaking dealer and LEAVE IT for a simple inspection..(dealer will NOT do it right then and there, nor do i expect that) ill be damned im on going to have to get a ride to Drop me off, then ANOTHER ride for someone to take me to my dealer 20 miles away for a inspection or a lightbulb replaced. as cool as my dealer is. they have (1) Guy to work on all their atvs and victorys.. ANYTHING you want done requires you to Leave the bike over night..... guess what.. HELL NO!! i will not only NOT leave my bike over night for a inspection/oil change. I also will not put someone else through the hassle of driving to the dealer 2X just for a simple task.. example Oil change, light bulb, install tire etc.. Most of us do Not have a dealer around the corner and not everyone has a trailer to trailer their bike to the dealer.. personally Im not going to pay $80 for a oil change Plus the gas and shear effort of finding a ride 2 times. Ill do this for a Warranty repairor something major. im not going to pay the dealer to pump my rear shock full of air before i go on a trip.. i DO buy my filters, victory accessories and all related parts i need from my dealer.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-26 8:48 PM (#117696 - in reply to #117693)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
Now calm down Don.  Don't let all this talk of oil and tires rile you.  Everyone has their own concept of what it means to motorcycle.  I am cheap, but not so cheap that I have to put on a car tire.  I figure if I took my bike to the dealer for things like oil and tire changes I'd have to take out a loan just to maintain it.  I've been without a dealer for sometime now, but we now have a local one.  I'm going to do my best to promote it and send him business.  As for me, I like the intimacy of working on my machine and maintain intimacy with my bride as well, so nothing is compromised.  You know there are some men you just can't reach...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-26 8:52 PM (#117698 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada
Just teasin', Chris. You know me <grin>

I likes to get 'em goin' - rub a little salt in the wound, shit like that ....

ESPECIALLY when the 'oil' word gets introduced, right?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Arkainzeye
Posted 2012-06-26 8:54 PM (#117699 - in reply to #117698)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3773
Pittsburgh, PA
donetracey - 2012-06-26 8:52 PM

Just teasin', Chris. You know me

I likes to get 'em goin' - rub a little salt in the wound, shit like that ....

ESPECIALLY when the 'oil' word gets introduced, right?


. we all know you pay someone to tie your shoes.. lol

Edited by Arkainzeye 2012-06-26 8:56 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-26 9:03 PM (#117700 - in reply to #117698)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
I know old friend, I was just sliding in a cheap shot at the cheapskates...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Travelin Man
Posted 2012-06-26 9:51 PM (#117704 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Iron Butt

Posts: 721

Okay, having read all the posts on this thread I figured I could jump in and give my two cents worth.

First, every time I read a post from a Darksider espousing the virtues of going to the Darkside the PRIMARY reason stated for doing so is because of longer tire life than what you get from a typical motorcycle tire, this tells me the primary reason for going to the Darkside is simply to save money.  In other words they do not like paying to change their rear motorcycle tire every 15K miles and would rather get 30K to 40K miles out of a car tire mounted on their motorcycle, otherwise known as being CHEAP.  There are many places you can save money and be cheaper with things related to your motorcycle, tires are not some of those things.

Second, I have used Amsoil 10W-40 in my Vision since I hit the 10K mile mark with a noticeable increase in the smoothness in shifting and I change my oil every 3K miles. the oil filter every 6K miles.  I buy my supplies from my local Honda DEALER, a dealer I have been doing business with for over ten years because they give me a 20% discount off of their marked prices, something not every customer of theirs gets, and I have their service department do my tire changes because (again, I am on great terms with the service writers and manager) I can call them up and tell them I am bringing my bike in the next day and when I bring it in they get the tires changed out in about an hour and a half.  The oil filters I get from this Honda dealer are Polaris/Victory filters simply due to the fact that they are a current Polaris dealer and a former Victory dealer (they dropped Victory in 2003 due to differences with Victory's allotment procedures).  I support my Victory dealer, the fantastic Randy's Cycles in Marengo, Illinois, by buying most of my accessories and all of my Victory apparel from him as his prices basically match what you can find on the internet.  Oh, it helps that the Honda dealer (Nielsen Enterprises in Lake Villa, Illinois) is only five minutes from my house versus forty five minutes to an hour to get to Randy's, and believe it or not Randy is cool with that!

Third, I have discovered that Wizard Products (no relation to my own Mr. Wizard's BC) are absolutely fantastic for cleaning, polishing, and otherwise keeping my Vision looking fantastic, I highly recommend them, especially the paint sealer which gives a finish just like Liquid Glass but at half the price.

Peace Brothers..............

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-26 10:03 PM (#117706 - in reply to #117690)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
Arkainzeye - 2012-06-26 6:17 PM

just wondering what is the Micro filteration rating on those life time oil filters vs say a Vic oem filter? My dealer gives me a Great deal on Oem vic filters and since my 11 vision has a 5000 mile Oil Change interval it would take me 20+(or over 100K miles) oil changes to break even if that life time oil filter is $140 still.

Ive been interested in those filters. i just never heard any Tech specs on them. when i had my 08 vision i changed the oil alot more often, not so much now..


I can't recall the numbers off the top of my head but when I researched it many moons ago the pore size and efficiency beat vic filter spec.

I got a really good deal on mine... Probably still wont pay for itself...

I have an 09 and change every 5k.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-26 11:14 PM (#117714 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
I don't get you guys. You're willing to babble on and on here or the VMC, but why don't you take it to the Mythbuster site? Are you guys lazy, concerned your position might be shown to be false, or do you just like to sit here and blow smoke up our buts to get a rise out of others.

Everyone got excited when they used a Victory for one of their myths, but you wouldn't find a segment on this interesting? Who cares if it does or doesn't put the debate to rest if the segment is fun to watch, and potentially provides us with information we wouldn't normally be concerned with.

The only possible way we can get it to happen is to take all the crap we babbled about here and post it there. Only if there is a large enough interest will they take notice. Hell, you can be lazy, and cut and paste the same crap you have posted here and on other threads.

Edited by sgiacci 2012-06-26 11:15 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-06-27 12:11 AM (#117716 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada
I AIN'T DOING NO OTHER 'sites' .... This one here is THE BEST thanks to the folks that built it - and look after it - our WebMiesters.

And we can discuss/discourse/disrespect any DAMNED THING WE LIKE/HATE ---- right HERE !!!!

Any site without our VaRyder ain't worth spit anyway .... except when we talk about SMART CARS
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Rollin'
Posted 2012-06-27 1:03 AM (#117721 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Iron Butt

Posts: 825
, WI

You can sit around and talk or you really could get out and ride.

The Dunlop Winter Sport. The best tire I have ever had on a road trip. Over 11,000 miles of every kind of road condition.

Two lane, interstate, mountain roads, gravel, rocks, mud, pouring rain for 100's and 100's of miles, hill climbs, dips, pot holes, frost heaves.

Never broke loose. Taking off from a stop in the rain I could feel it dig in. The most confidence I have ever had riding in the rain.

Just based on personal experience. I don't sell tires, couldn't careless what everyone else does.

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
DSmith
Posted 2012-06-27 8:57 AM (#117739 - in reply to #117721)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 77
Bainville, & Mesa, AZ, MT
Rollin' - 2012-06-27 12:03 AM

You can sit around and talk or you really could get out and ride.

The Dunlop Winter Sport. The best tire I have ever had on a road trip. Over 11,000 miles of every kind of road condition.

Two lane, interstate, mountain roads, gravel, rocks, mud, pouring rain for 100's and 100's of miles, hill climbs, dips, pot holes, frost heaves.

Never broke loose. Taking off from a stop in the rain I could feel it dig in. The most confidence I have ever had riding in the rain.

Just based on personal experience. I don't sell tires, couldn't careless what everyone else does.

?




Who needs Mythbusters when we have Rollin, thanks for the real life input.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-27 9:19 AM (#117741 - in reply to #117714)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
sgiacci - 2012-06-26 9:14 PM

I don't get you guys. You're willing to babble on and on here or the VMC, but why don't you take it to the


Because there are no myths when it comes to putting a car tire on a motorcycle... Do you know how to read? That has to be the 5th time I have typed that.

Edited by Kelvininin 2012-06-27 9:19 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
pollolittle
Posted 2012-06-27 9:31 AM (#117744 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2027
Brighton, TN
5 times he's typed it, Gosh, Geez, another page and yet anyone to show the Butt-O-Meter of how it rides, with no hands and hard and aggressive.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
smadge
Posted 2012-06-27 9:57 AM (#117747 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 125
Kerrville Texas ( now a homeowner on six acres)
All,
I have had my machine serviced in about 10 different dealers across the U. S. I have never had to "drop it off and be without it". However, I ALWAYS call and make an appointment so that they are ready for me when I get there.I ride 100 miles to get an oil change. Wait at the dealer and talk about stuff with the dealer and then ride back home the same day.I am not a mechanic even in my dreams. I can turn a wrench if someone is there to tell me which wrench and what bolt. I love all the oem stuff the dealer puts onto and into my vision as that is the stuff it was tested with before it was produced.
Just the thoughts of a new guy.
1968 kawasaki 125
1981 Yamaha 650 special
2005 Vic kingpen
2008 Vic Vision

Smadge
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-27 10:02 AM (#117748 - in reply to #117744)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA

pollolittle - 2012-06-27 10:31 AM 5 times he's typed it, Gosh, Geez, another page and yet anyone to show the Butt-O-Meter of how it rides, with no hands and hard and aggressive.

 Not only no hands while riding aggressively, but you can stand on the seat and juggle knives while riding in the sphere of death.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kelvininin
Posted 2012-06-27 10:07 AM (#117749 - in reply to #117748)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Cruiser

Posts: 188
varyder - 2012-06-27 8:02 AM

pollolittle - 2012-06-27 10:31 AM 5 times he's typed it, Gosh, Geez, another page and yet anyone to show the Butt-O-Meter of how it rides, with no hands and hard and aggressive.

?Not only no hands while riding aggressively, but you can stand on the seat and juggle knives while riding in the sphere of death.



Knives?! I thought it was flaming chain saws.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sgiacci
Posted 2012-06-27 11:17 AM (#117757 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 401
I found a picture sequence of Kelvininin while he expounds about darksiding.

LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA ... Can't hear you... LA LA LA LA LA LA LA



(Hear_No_Evil,_See_No_Evil,_Speak_No_Evil.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Hear_No_Evil,_See_No_Evil,_Speak_No_Evil.jpg (25KB - 3 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-06-27 11:37 AM (#117760 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA

I am always amused at these threads.  Most everyone who rides a Vision absolutely loves it and prefer it over any other bike, but not everyone feels that way.  I liken these discussion to conversations I've had with a Gold Winger or two and even BMWers.  They will agrue that a Gold Wing will do everything better than a Vision, and then some.  But everyone that I know has to stop around that hour to hour and half mark, because that's being safe.  I know it be from riding one is because my body hurts.  I listen to the BMWers and the Gold Wingers in their conversations and hear how they hurt from riding also, they talk about being too hot from the engine, or some other discomfort.  Yet when I tell them how much better the Vision is in those areas they deny they have any issue.  I have finally learned just to smile and listen, knowing what I absolutely know for a fact. 

I've done that same thing with going darkside, having read and consider everything that has been written and said about it.  In all of that reading, even the experts have convinced me that riding a car tire is not for me, with the exception of perhaps the Alaskian highway trip.  

At best these threads bring a lot of humor and content to the forums but nothing more.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
CoolHandLuke
Posted 2012-06-27 1:24 PM (#117772 - in reply to #117760)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Iron Butt

Posts: 849
, FL United States
Well said, Sir
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gray rider
Posted 2012-06-27 7:49 PM (#117818 - in reply to #117772)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Tourer

Posts: 394
Tucson, AZ
And I agree. What if we all used the same oil!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
radioteacher
Posted 2012-07-02 6:27 PM (#118311 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 3006
San Antonio, TX
I was off the forum for three weeks and this thread happens. Oh well. It fun to watch the kids play in the sand box....that the cats use at night.

Ride safe
Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-07-02 8:51 PM (#118327 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA
I'm waiting for the mythbuster do one on eating 50 eggs.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Rollin'
Posted 2012-07-03 10:30 PM (#118410 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: RE: Mythbuster Darksiding


Iron Butt

Posts: 825
, WI
Top of the page Bottom of the page
donetracey
Posted 2012-07-04 1:19 AM (#118414 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 2118
Pitt Meadows, BC Canada
The SILENCE is deafening, Chris. Fact is, DARKSIDERS are just bikers who don't know what real biking is. They ride slow, and carefully (maybe) and make sure they get high mileage out of their rubber. Well, good for them. If that's what they want. I have NO problem with that.
They just wouldn't be riding with me - because I RIDE.
Tourists - yes. Stop and look at the view - yes. Kewl ladies - YES!
Not my space - I like to RIDE - and FAST - and none of them could be in MY view when I ride.
It's all what you love - and I love HANDLING - and SPEED and knowing what my bike will DO when I ask it to DO something.
I AIN'T DEAD YET. And AIN'T DYING because I am CHEAP with rubber ....

Love bikin' - and Bikers. All folks are different - and want different things from their sport. For me - best handling I can get out of my bike. Never do ANYTHING to make it WORSE !

Top of the page Bottom of the page
varyder
Posted 2012-07-04 7:27 AM (#118423 - in reply to #117324)
Subject: Re: Mythbuster Darksiding


Visionary

Posts: 8144
New Bohemia, VA

Now Don. I promised not to enthrall folks any longer these discussion of the darkside. I wouldn't say they weren't real bikers, they are breaking boundries, afterall. I don't know what folks view of riding fast is but I have stretched the boundries on a Vision without flinching in comparison to any other bike I've ridden. The reason I attribute that to is where the rubber meats (sic) the road. I have an older brother, about 5 years, and there are a lot of things I never tried because of him. He was thoroughly convinced it was the right thing to do, only to find out that it wasn't and then have to pay the consequence for it, even to this day. So, I say live and let live. I'm with you, riding has become a very common thing for me, but continues to have that solid encitement each time I stradle the saddle. I will not become complacent, nor will I compromise. Even the experts have shared enough information that a car tire will never go on my bike unless they quit making motorcycle tires or I go on the Alaskian trip.

By the way ROLLIN' - After you completed your Alaskian trip, how do you think the stock tire would have fared?



Edited by varyder 2012-07-04 7:30 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page